Kamerman v. Steinberg’s Empirical Analysis
891 F.2d 424 · 1989
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably United States v. Bilzerian (1991), Swarna v. Al-Awadi (2010)
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78M (§ 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78R (§ 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1912
Relies on Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis · Ohio State Board of Education v. Reed · Public Broadcasting Service v. Network Project · Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a threat, (2) which was unlawfully made, and (3) caused involuntary acceptance of contract terms, (4) because the circumstances permitted no other alternative.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“One complaining of a false or misleading statement in a Schedule 13D may seek damages only under Section 18(a) of the Act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[W]hen there is a judgment in a consolidated case that does not dispose of all claims which have been consolidated, there is a strong presumption that the judgment is not appealable absent Rule 54(b) certification. In highly unusual circumstances, a litigant may be able to overcome this presumption and convince us that we should consider the merits of the appeal immediately, rather than waiting for a final judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.