Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

891 F.2d 520

Docket No. 89-3678.

Mintz v. Barthelemy

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Dec. 22, 1989. Rehearing Denied Jan. 24, 1990.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1989-12-22

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1996

3 federal appellate · 3 district ·

4 counsel of record

Relies on 722 F. Supp. 273 - Mintz v. Barthelemy

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1989-12-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

George C. Freeman, III, Phillip A. Wittmann, Richard C. Stanley, David K. Hall, Stone, Pigman, Walther, Wittmann, & Hutchinson, New Orleans, LA., for plaintiff-appellant.

Morton H. Katz, Russ M. Herman, Herman, Herman, Katz & Cotlar, Julian R. Murray and Okla Jones, III, City Atty., Murray and Braden, New Orleans, LA., for Barthelemy.

Dale Charles Wilks, New Orleans, LA., John Neely Kennedy, Sp. Counsel to the Governor, Baton Rouge, LA., Jeffery Mark Lynch, Louisiana Dept. of Justice, New Orleans, LA., for Guste.

Wilson & Sexton, John Neely Kennedy, Sp. Counsel to the Governor, Office of the Governor, R. Gray Sexton, Executive Secretary, Louisiana Ethics Admin. Program, Baton Rouge, LA., for Supervisory Committee, etc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before THORNBERRY, JOHNSON, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:

¶1

Affirmed on the basis of the district court's opinion at 722 F.Supp. 273 (E.D.La.1989).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/891/f2d/520 · .json · Public domain