Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 F.2d 583 - Hendrick v. Avent

Hendrick v. Avent’s Empirical Analysis

891 F.2d 583 · 1990

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
2
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Nos. 90-2039, 90-2040 (1992), New Castle County v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (1991)

24 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

2801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Porzig v. Nolden · Wrenn v. Ohio Department of Mental Health · Colley v. National Bank of Texas · Wrenn v. Board of Directors · Nilsen v. City of Moss Point

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and ... not more than one year after the judgment, order, or proceeding was entered or taken.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the determination by the bankruptcy court [was] the final authorization of the transfer of title and the subsequent adversary proceeding [was] a direct challenge to that transfer of title”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “at the time of the bankruptcy court ruling, neither [the plaintiff] nor the court had full knowledge of all that had taken place in a complex scheme of facts,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.