Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 F.2d 688 - Blancada v. Turnage

Blancada v. Turnage’s Empirical Analysis

891 F.2d 688 · 1989

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
April 2004
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably Anderson v. McElroy (1992), Michael v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1995)

17 federal appellate · 5 district ·

300198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha · Chadha v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Lonnie Gene Chatman v. J. Marquez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “raises a non-frivolous constitutional issue yet undecided by our circuit or the Supreme Court,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “pending the BIA's determination of [the] motion to reopen and in the event of an adverse ruling, pending the determination of any timely appeal to [the Ninth Circuit].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “district court has jurisdiction on habeas to review the district director's, [immigration judge]'s, or BIA's denial of a stay of deportation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.