United States v. King’s Empirical Analysis
891 F.2d 780 · 1989
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2013
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 113 · 18 U.S.C. § 13 (Assimilative Crimes Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3013 · 42 U.S.C. § 10603
Relies on New York State Club Association Inc v. City of New York · V Harry E Beck Jr et al. · United States v. La Franca · Hein v. Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc. · Twin City Nat Bank of New Brighton v. Nebecker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at the purpose of the Victims of Crime Act was to provide limited Federal Funding to the States, with minimal bureaucratic ‘strings attached,’ for direct compensation and service programs to assist victims of crime, including victims of federal crime. In addition, it provides funds to improve Federal efforts which assist crime victims, and establishes a Federal Victim Assistance Committee. A Federal Victim Assistance Administrator in the Department of Justice will coordinate Federal efforts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to generate needed income to offset the cost of the [victim assistance] programs authorized under S.2423. Although substantial amounts will not result, the additional amounts will be helpful in financing the program and will constitute new income for the Federal government.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.