Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 F.2d 800 - Scott v. Dugger

Scott v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis

891 F.2d 800 · 1989

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 2013
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2013 · most notably Deboue v. Louisiana (1990), Graham v. Johnson (1999)

8 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions

1701989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Lockett v. Ohio · Taylor v. Louisiana · Duren v. Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]ppellant's lawyer could not have rendered ineffective assistance by failing or refusing to present a false defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “whether Florida's aggravating circumstance of "especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.