United States v. Dillard’s Empirical Analysis
891 F.3d 151 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2259 (§ 40113 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. Lambey · 134 S. Ct. 1710 - Paroline v. United States · United States v. Llamas · Paroline v. United States · United States v. Delfino
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“uncontested that the individuals seeking restitution were Dillard's victims and had outstanding losses associated with the continued trade in their images, they were entitled by statute to some non-nominal amount of restitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hile the statute informs the court's analysis as to a proper amount of restitution, it sets no numeric limits on the amount of restitution that can be ordered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[g]overnment satisfied its burden of causation by the uncontested evidence that Dillard's offense conduct included the seven non-contact victims' images”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.