Schmidt v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis
891 F.3d 302 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Anders v. California · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Williams v. Taylor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ex parte in-camera inspection of the Court and the defendant and seal those records.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schmidt v. Foster“It's off the record. Yeah, you can talk. But he should just be reviewing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Schmidt v. Foster“did not involve a provocation and it was not an adequate provocation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Schmidt v. Foster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.