Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 NE2D 1131 - Baumgartner v. State

Baumgartner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kien v. State · Isaacs v. State · Rhinehardt v. State · Vermillion v. State · Morse v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] statute is void for vagueness only if it is vague as applied to the precise cireumstances of the present case.... The defendant is not at liberty to devise hypothetical situations which might demonstrate vagueness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “even if we were to consider [the defendant's] argument upon the merit s, he would not prevail because his challenge to the statute as unconstitutionally vague fails”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the constitutionality of a statute may be raised at any stage of the proceeding including raising the issue sua sponte by this Court,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.