Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
1 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Washington · Giles v. California · State v. Dedman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"ex parte in-court testimony or its functional equivalent-that is, material such as affidavits, custodial examinations, pri- or testimony that the defendant was unable to cross-examine, or similar pretrial statements that declarants would reasonably expect to be used prosecuto-rially;" "extrajudicial statements contained in formalized testimonial materials, such as affidavits, depositions, prior testimony, or confessions;" and "statements that were made under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“ex parte in-court testimony or its functional equivalent-that is, material such as affidavits, custodial examinations, pri- or testimony that the defendant was unable to cross-examine, or similar pretrial statements that declarants would reasonably expect to be used prosecuto-rially;”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.