Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 NW2D 638 - Loving v. State

Loving v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Scheffer · Holmes v. South Carolina · Montana v. Egelhoff · State v. Spaulding · State v. Moore

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a painstaking review of the record to determine whether the evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict, were sufficient to allow the jury to reach its verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “after the defendant formed the intent to kill, some appreciable time passed during which the consideration, planning, preparation or determination ... prior to the commission of the act took place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “acceptance of the State's evidence and its rejection of any evidence in the record that is inconsistent with the circumstances proved by the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.