Strother v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2024
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A
Relies on Stock v. State · L. A. M. v. State · 82 Ill. App. 3d 530 - People v. Harrison · Holton v. State · Michael v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“because such an act generally does not deprive the other joint custodian of his or her custody rights.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“To prove larceny, the government not only had to prove that the defendant intended to use someone’s property for purposes inconsistent with the owner’s rights, but also had to prove that the defendant had no right to take possession of the property — that the defendant committed a trespass by the very act of laying hands on the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. LaParle v. State“But if a parent takes custody of the child and exercises that custody in a manner that defeats the custody rights of the other parent, unlawfully `keeping' the child from the other parent, then the parent's conduct constitutes the actus reus of custodial interference.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vachon v. Pugliese
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.