King v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “In any future proceedings seeking the vacation of the previously awarded jail credit, the State should consider the impact of this court's opinion in Lebron v. State, 870 So.2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that a trial court may not rescind jail credit previously awarded even if the initial award was improper), and the opinion of the First District Court of Appeal in Wheeler v. State, 880 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (citing Lebron with approval).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 913 So. 2d 758 - King v. State

2. “only if the correction of the sentencing error would benefit the defendant or to correct a scrivener's error.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 988 So. 2d 70 - Linnon v. State