¶1Douglas Walker, pro se, petitioner.
¶2No appearance for respondent.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4DENIED. See Hollingsworth v. Szczecina,731 So.2d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
¶5DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
891 So. 2d 1135
Docket No. 1D04-4257.
Douglas WALKER, Petitioner, v. James V. CROSBY, Jr., Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 19, 2005.
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-01-19
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2009
1 state decisions
Relies on Hollingsworth v. Szczecina
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-01-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Douglas Walker, pro se, petitioner.
¶2No appearance for respondent.
¶3PER CURIAM.
¶4DENIED. See Hollingsworth v. Szczecina,731 So.2d 790 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
¶5DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK and HAWKES, JJ., concur.