Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

891 So. 2d 1193

Guy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 2, 2005

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-02-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2005

1 state decisions

Relies on 513 So. 2d 1323 - State v. Gribeiro

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-02-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Stevens Guy entered a plea of nolo con-tendere to charges of possession of heroin, possession of cocaine, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Under the plea agreement, he reserved for appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We conclude that the motion to suppress *1194was correctly denied. See State v. Gribeiro, 513 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

¶2We remand for correction of the judgment, which erroneously indicates that the defendant-appellant Guy entered a plea of guilty. In reality, he entered a plea of nolo contendere. The defendant need not be present for the correction of the judgment.

¶3Affirmed; remanded for correction of judgment.

/891/so2d/1193 · .json · Public domain