Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 So. 2d 26 - State v. Williams

891 So. 2d 26 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Burks v. United States · 750 So. 2d 867 - State v. Hampton · 420 So. 2d 1116 - State v. Williams · 513 So. 2d 1159 - State v. Schenck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is similar to the standard for appellate review of the sufficiency of evidence to support a defendant's conviction that the court must determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “shall be granted only if the court finds that the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the state, does not reasonably permit a finding of guilty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.