Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 So. 2d 752 - State v. Bertrand

891 So. 2d 752 - State v. Bertrand’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Pearce · Blackledge v. Perry · State v. Sepulvado · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Ait. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions. Where the record clearly shows an adequate factual basis for the sentence imposed, resentencing is unnecessary even when there has not been full compliance with Art. 894.1 ... The reviewing court shall not set aside a sentence for excessiveness if the record supports the sentence imposed. (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “|19Failure to make or file a motion to reconsider sentence or to include a specific ground upon which a motion to reconsider sentence may be based, including a claim of excessiveness, shall preclude the state or the defendant from raising an objection to the sentence or from urging any ground not raised in the motion on appeal or review.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.