Lundy v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
April 2007
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. State · Maddox v. State · Ward v. State · Santos v. State · Hooten v. Enriquez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) make arrests when necessary to prevent or abate the commission of an offense against the laws of the state or a political subdivision of the state when the offense or threatened offense ... involves “the area within the boundaries wherein service is provided or is supported by a general sales and use tax;” (2) enforce all traffic laws and investigate traffic accidents which involve or occur in “the area within the boundaries wherein service is provided or is supported by a general sales and use tax;” (3) make arrests in cases of an offense involving injury or detriment to “the area within the boundaries wherein service is provided or is supported by a general sales and use tax;” and (4) provide emergency and public safety services to the system or persons who use “the area within the boundaries wherein service is provided or is supported by a general sales and use tax.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Norton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.