Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 SW2D 766 - Gentry v. Tucker

Gentry v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2017

6 state decisions

40199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 14th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Gonzalez v. Nielson · Grozier v. L-B Sprinkler & Plumbing Repair · Langever v. United Advertising Corp. · Talbert v. Miles · Perkola v. Koelling & Associates, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The motion [to transfer venue] will be waived if the defendant who is filing it, without first insisting upon its disposition, tries the case on the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.