Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 891 SW2D 863 - Reece v. State

Reece v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Dusky v. United States · Drope v. Missouri · Godinez v. Moran · Nicholas v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To prevail on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, movant must have proven, by a preponderance of evidence, that his trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficient performance prejudiced the outcome in his case (as opposed to showing the deficient performance had some conceivable effect on the outcome). Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). A movant “must satisfy both the performance prong and the prejudice prong to prevail on an ineffective assistance of ’counsel claim.” Sanders v. State, [ 738 S.W.2d 856, 857 (Mo.banc 1987)] (emphasis in original)....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.