Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 A2D 1144 - Davis & Associates v. Williams

Davis & Associates v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

5 district · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Western Pacific Railroad · Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Weinberger · Parreco v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission · National Treasury Employees Union v. King · Heard v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to adjudicate the type of controversy presented by the case.” Davis & Assocs. v. Williams, 892 A.2d 1144, 1148 (D.C.2006). A jurisdictional amendment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.