Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 F.2d 1028 - Hahn v. Wong

Hahn v. Wong’s Empirical Analysis

892 F.2d 1028 · 1989

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably Cooper v. Goldfarb (1998), Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (2009)

6 federal appellate · 7 district ·

19019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 135

Relies on Berry v. Webb · Reese v. Hurst · Womack v. Merit Systems Protection Board · Oka v. Youssefyeh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he inventor . . . must provide independent corroborating evidence in addition to his own statements and documents.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To establish reduction to practice of a chemical composition, it is sufficient to prove 'that the inventor actually prepared the composition and knew it would work.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “affiants' statements that by a certain date they had `read and understood' specified pages of Stephen Hahn's laboratory notebooks did not corroborate a reduction to practice . . . because they established only that those pages existed on a certain date. . . [and] did not independently corroborate the statements made on those pages”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.