NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Having provided plaintiffs considerable guidance and ample time to submit an adequate complaint, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs' amended complaint for failure to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a), (e)(1). See Nevijel v. North Coast Life Ins. Co., 651 F.2d 671, 674 (9th Cir.1981). Plaintiffs' motions for oral argument, for enlargement of time to designate the record and to augment the record are denied; no FRAP 46(c) sanctions will be imposed.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3