United States v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.2d 11 · 1989
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2006
13 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miller v. Fenton · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Crenshaw · Brown v. Schweitzer · United States v. Capone · United States v. Ingraldi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause we hold that the out-of-court photospread identifications were properly admitted into evidence, we need not address defendant's contention that an in-court identification of him ... was inadmissible because it could not be shown to have had an independent source”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“of such a character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be comment on the failure of the accused to testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is only in extraordinary cases that identification evidence should be withheld from the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.