Hall v. Kelso’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.2d 1541 · 1990
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2014
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Teague v. Lane · Morissette v. United States · Sandstrom v. Montana · Patterson v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a burden-shifting error would be subject to retroactive correction on habeas review because not only is it a “bedrock, ‘axiomatic and elementary’ [constitutional] principle,” Yates v. Aiken, 484 U.S. 211 , 108 S. Ct. 534,536 , 98 L. Ed. 2d 546 (1988) (quoting Francis v. Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 , 105 S. Ct. 1965 , 85 L. Ed. 2d 344 (1985) (quoting In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 , 90 S. Ct. 1068 , 25 L. Ed. 2d 368 (1970))), but it is also an error that diminishes the “likelihood of an accurate conviction.” Teague , [489] U.S. at [290], 109 S. Ct. at 1077 (plurality).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Teague is no bar to the application of Sandstrom”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Johnson v. McKune
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.