Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 F.2d 187 - Janetka v. Dabe

Janetka v. Dabe’s Empirical Analysis

892 F.2d 187 · 1989

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably DeLaurentis v. City of New Haven (1991), Murphy v. Lynn (1997)

21 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

41019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico · Keeble v. United States · Singleton v. City of New York · Martin v. City of Albany · Halberstadt v. . New York Life Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Allowing police officers to add unwarranted misdemeanor charges to valid violation charges may force an accused to go to trial on the misdemeanor when he otherwise would plead to the violation. If the dispositive factor is whether, as the district court held, the charge resulting in acquittal ‘arose out of events that occurred on the same occasion’ as a charge resulting in conviction, then police officers could add unsupported serious charges to legitimate minor charges with impunity.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the defendant either commenced or continued a criminal proceeding against him; (2) that the proceeding terminated in his favor; (3) that there was no probable cause for the criminal proceeding; and (4) that the criminal proceeding was instituted in actual malice.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Each of these offenses contains entirely different elements, neither charge is a lesser-included offense of the other, and the charges were not tried as part of the same proceeding; in this context, it is reasonable to interpret the prosecutor’s decision to not pursue the drug-related charges as consistent with ... a finding of innocence on these specific counts of the indictment.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.