Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 F.2d 43 - Stein v. Sullivan

Stein v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

892 F.2d 43 · 1989

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
November 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Skinner v. Astrue (2007), Carlson v. Shalala (1993)

4 federal appellate ·

1901989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Garfield v. Schweiker · Delgado v. Bowen · Zblewski v. Schweiker · Bauzo v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Is the claimant presently unemployed? (2) Is the claimant’s impairment “severe?” (3) Does the impairment meet or exceed one of the list of specific impairments? [see 20 C.F.R. § 404 , Subpt. P, App. 1] (4) Is the claimant unable to perform his or her former occupation? (5) Is the claimant unable to perform any other work within the economy? An affirmative answer leads either to the next step or, on steps 3 and 5, to a finding that the claimant is disabled. A negative answer at any point, other than step 3, stops inquiry and leads to a determination that the claimant is not disabled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the issue is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the date chosen by [the ALJ], not whether an earlier date could have been supported.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.