Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 F.2d 549 - Sluder v. United Mine Workers

Sluder v. United Mine Workers’s Empirical Analysis

892 F.2d 549 · 1989

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
December 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 2015

5 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck · Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization representing employees in an industry affecting commerce as defined in this Act, or between any such labor organizations, may be brought in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect to the amount in controversy or without regard to the citizenship of parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.