Guerts v. Barth’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.2d 622 · 1989
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2002
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine v. George A. Fuller Co. · Spanish Action Committee v. City of Chicago · Willits v. Yellow Cab Co. · 143 Ind. App. 660 - Lengyel v. Hecht
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“while [plaintiff's] objection was distinct enough to inform the court of the matter to which he was objecting, his general objection does not state with any degree of specificity the grounds for his objection”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.