Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 F.2d 653 - Hannon v. Turnage

Hannon v. Turnage’s Empirical Analysis

892 F.2d 653 · 1990

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently October 2017 · most notably Melton v. City of Oklahoma City (1991), Gorman v. Robinson (1992)

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

660199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the individual’s good name, reputation, honor or integrity are at stake by such charges as immorality, dishonesty, alcoholism, disloyalty, Communism, or subversive acts; or (2) the state imposes a stigma or other disability on the individual which forecloses other opportunities.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to prevail, even assuming that any information surrounding his dismissal was sufficiently damning to implicate a liberty interest, the government must still have participated in the dissemination of this information to the public.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.