United States v. Barcus’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.3d 228 · 2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (Amber Hagerman Child Protection Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2246 · 18 U.S.C. § 2250 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 34 U.S.C. § 20911
Relies on United States v. Olano · Stinson v. United States · Descamps v. United States · 195 L. Ed. 2d 604 - Mathis v. United States · Descamps v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To answer whether Tennessee aggravated sexual battery is [comparable to a specified federal offense], we join other circuits in applying the categorical approach.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re A.C.C.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.