Cross v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.3d 288 · 2018
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Anders v. California · United States v. Booker · Taylor v. United States · Teague v. Lane · Koon v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“improperly reads a merits analysis into the limitations period.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the movant must ultimately prove that the right applies to his situation.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.