Martinez v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.3d 655 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Immigration and Naturalization Service, v. Juan Anibal Aguirre-Aguirre · Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez · Descamps v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“set[ ] out alternate elements that create multiple forms of the criminal offense and at least one form of the offense qualifies-by its elements-as the generic predicate offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cabrera v. Barr“[i]f all permutations of the conduct proscribed by the elements of the offense involve moral turpitude, then the offense categorically qualifies as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cabrera v. Barr“[a] statute that lists alternative means of committing a single offense, rather than alternative elements , is not divisible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cabrera v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.