Huckaba v. Ref-Chem, L.P.’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.3d 686 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. Webster · Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America · In Re Halliburton Co. · Carter v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc. · Coffel v. Stryker Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[B]ecause the validity of the agreement is a matter of contract, at this stage, the strong federal policy favoring arbitration does not apply.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Determining whether there is a valid arbitration agreement is a question of state contract law and is for the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“by signing this agreement the parties are giving up any right they may have to sue each other”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.