United States v. Dyer’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.3d 910 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986)
Relies on Spiegla v. Hull · United States v. Sura · United States v. Chapa · United States v. Adigun · United States v. Gonzalez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a defendant must demonstrate a reasonable probability that, but for the court's plain error, he would not have entered the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.