Gomez-Sanchez v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
892 F.3d 985 · 2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Dusky v. United States · National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet Services · Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research v. United States · Household Credit Services, Inc. v. Pfennig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“constrain[ing] the evidence that [judges] may consider when making a particularly serious crime determination”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.