Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 FSUPP 432 - Gray v. Millea

Gray v. Millea’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 2002
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Bibby v. United States · Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank · Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New York · Broughton v. State · Podell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By presenting to the court (whether by signing, ffling, submitting or later advocating) a pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney ... is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief formed after inquiry reasonable under the circumstances,-(2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a non-frivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law; (3) the allegations and other factual contentions have cvi-dentiary support.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[Rule 11] emphasizes the duty of candor by subjecting litigants to potential sanctions for insisting on a position after it is no longer tenable.... A Litigant's obligations with respect to the contents of these papers ... include reaffirming to the court and advocating positions contained in these pleadings and motions after learning that they cease to have any merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.