Lee v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
54
cited by 54 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
54 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blockburger v. United States · Richardson v. State · Spivey v. State · Houser v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test is not merely whether the evi-dentiary facts used to establish one of the essential elements of one offense may also have been used to establish one of the essential elements of a second challenged offense. In other words, under the Richardson actual evidence test, the Indiana Double Jeopardy Clause is not violated when the evidentiary facts establishing the essential elements of one offense also establish only one or even several, but not all, of the essential elements of a second offense.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“a reasonable possibility that the evidentiary facts used by the fact-finder to establish the essential elements of one offense may also have been used to establish the essential elements of a second challenged offense.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“'identify the essential elements of each of the challenged crimes and to evaluate the evidence from the [fact-finder's] perspec tive.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.