Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 NE2D 637 - Woods v. State

Woods v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Black v. Romano · Cox v. State · Prewitt v. State · Neff v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all probation requires 'strict compliance'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [probationer] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a ‘neutral and detached’ hearing body ...; and (f) a written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking [probation].”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “even a probationer who admits the allegations against him must still be given an opportunity to offer mitigating evidence suggesting that the violation does not warrant revocation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.