Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 N.W.2d 801 - State v. Guzman

State v. Guzman’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Mississippi · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest · State v. Griller · State v. Mahkuk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A district court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To obtain reversal of an evidentiary ruling on appeal, the appellant must show both that the district court abused its discretion in admitting the evidence and that the appellant was thereby prejudiced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.