Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 P2D 164 - Cluff v. Nana-Marriott

Cluff v. Nana-Marriott’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 2019

6 state decisions

30199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 6 Cal. 3d 771 - Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board · Yahara v. Construction & Rigging, Inc. · Childs v. Kalgin Island Lodge · Kodiak Oilfield Haulers v. Adams · Municipality of Anchorage v. Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[the existence of an implied contract must be determined by considering all the factors in light of the surrounding cireumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The circumstances surrounding the stress test are not sufficient to give rise to an implied employment contract. Even if [claimant] consented to act under [defendant's] control for the period of the test, neither party treated the test as an employment relationship [for workers' compensation purposes.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the requirements for finding an employment relationship for workers' compensation purposes between a lent employee and a special employer are stricter than the standards for finding an employment relationship between an employee and an employer where there is only one employer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.