892 So. 2d 1062 - Perry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 396 So. 2d 1107 - Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'n · 604 So. 2d 452 - Forsythe v. Longboat Key Beach Erosion · 642 So. 2d 742 - Carder v. State · 884 So. 2d 950 - Richardson v. State · 862 So. 2d 807 - McCall v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We find that the Richardson interpretation of subsections (2) and (5) is too restrictive. If the concept is accepted that a defendant is not “sentenced” when placed on probation or community control time, then those proceedings could never be used to enhance a subsequent offense because no sentence would ever be imposed. That is clearly contrary to the plain meaning of subsection (2), which makes it abundantly clear that the placing of a defendant on probation or community control can be used under this sentencing statute to qualify as a predicate “conviction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. White v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.