892 So. 2d 1238 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
46 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Kyles v. Whitley · Arizona v. Youngblood · Pulley v. Harris · Cage v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case. The argument shall not appeal to prejudice. The state's rebuttal shall be confined to answering the argument of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Late disclosure as well as non-disclosure of evidence favorable to the defendant requires reversal if it has significantly impacted the defendant's opportunity to present the material effectively in its case and compromised the fundamental fairness of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“warned prosecutors they are not to turn closing arguments into a plebiscite on crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.