892 So. 2d 191 - Burchfield v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"We cannot imagine any hearsay evidence more trustworthy and relied upon by the public than the ingredients label on an unopen box of medication purchased from a drug store. The Food and Drug Administration regulates over-the-counter medications. Failure to properly list the ingredients places the pharmaceutical manufacturer in peril."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 941 So. 2d 318 - Brand v. State

2. “packs were opened. The fact that the pills were in the original, unbroken packages indicates that the contents had not been changed since the manufacture packaged them. The labeling on the boxes clearly listed pseudoephedrine hydrochloride as one of the active ingredients in each pill. The ingredients labels on the boxes qualify as a”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 941 So. 2d 318 - Brand v. State

3. “[s]pecific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Eaddy v. State