892 So. 2d 21 - Wells v. Traynor’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 33 U.S.C. § 933
Relies on Spencer Gifts, Inc. v. Olitsky · Ames v. Sundance State Bank · 634 So. 2d 1180 - Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd. · 684 So. 2d 488 - Oakley v. Thebault · Capps v. N.L. Baroid-NL Industries, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Who had control over the employee and the work he was performing beyond mere suggestion of details or cooperation? 2. Whose work was being performed? 3. Was there an agreement, understanding, or meeting of the minds between the original and the borrowing employer? 4. Did the employee acquiesce in the new work situation? 5. Did the original employer terminate his relationship with the employee? 6. Who furnished tools and place for performance? 7. Was the new employment over a considerable length of time? 8. Who had the right to discharge the employee? 9. Who had the obligation to pay the employee?”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.