M.E.T. v. M.F.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Michael v. Gerald D · 554 So. 2d 406 - Ex Parte Presse · 686 So. 2d 1222 - Asam v. Devereaux · 57 Ala. App. 287 - Thoman Engineers, Inc. v. McDonald · 735 So. 2d 1172 - Ex Parte Melof
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e decline to do the [uncle's] research and to properly develop an argument on this issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.