Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 892 SO2D 518 - Davis v. State

Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 547 So. 2d 613 - State v. Smith · 537 So. 2d 564 - Magaw v. State · Delgado v. State · 514 So. 2d 1079 - Booker v. State · 699 So. 2d 1343 - Robertson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “By the time appellant stood trial, the Delgado court's new, definitive construction of section 810.02(1) was binding. The offense allegedly occurred before chapter 2001-58, section 1, Laws of Florida, took effect. By the time chapter 2001-58 was enacted, the Delgado court had already announced the controlling construction of section 810.02(1), Florida Statutes (1989), as to all cases not yet final as of August 24, 2000. The Legislature was powerless to alter the chronology of these historical facts or to blink their constitutional significance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.