Cason v. Crosby’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited
60 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 878 So. 2d 361 - Schmidt v. Crusoe · Burgess v. Crosby · 692 So. 2d 146 - Beach v. Great Western Bank · Davidson v. Crosby · 778 So. 2d 975 - Geffken v. Strickler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is a general canon of statutory construction that, when the legislature includes particular language in one section of a statute but not in another section of the same statute, the omitted language is presumed to have been excluded intentionally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“where the prisoner challenges the loss of gain-time, are collateral criminal proceedings and are exempt from section 57.085.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cox v. Crosby“in order to reduce unnecessary or frivolous prisoner filings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.