Gross v. Pieno’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 785 So. 2d 779 - Clark v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. · State v. Theriot · State v. Jacobs · 439 So. 2d 1055 - John Bailey Contr. v. St., Dept. of Tr. & Dev. · DeClouet v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the original judgment of abandonment was set for a hearing.... [P]laintiffs chose not to move forward with that hearing.... [I]t was this settlement that terminated the litigation in the underlying suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the plaintiffs, by failing to participate in the hearing on the abandonment motion, precluded the opportunity to litigate the abandonment issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“we'll never know because the Grosses decided to take a check rather than attend the [h]earing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.