Ex Parte Matthews’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 208th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Michigan v. Jackson · 22 Cal. 3d 493 - Scherling v. Superior Court · Barbee v. State · Holloway v. State · Ex Parte Matthews
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ny person who, in a legal manner, is held to answer for an offense, at any stage of the proceeding, or against whom complaint in a lawful manner is made charging an offense, including all proceedings from the order for arrest to the final execution of the law. The word "defendant” is used in the same sense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Matthews“one charged with an offense, esp: the defendant in a criminal case . The English Oxford Dictionary, p. 94 (2d ed.1989) defines accused as “[one] charged with a crime or fault.” . Blacks Law Dictionary 23 (6th ed.1990) defines accused: The generic name for the defendant in a criminal case. Person becomes”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Matthews“(a) Words and phrases shall be read in context and construed according to the rules of grammar and common usage. (b) Words and phrases that have acquired a technical or particular meaning, whether by legislative definition or otherwise, shall be construed accordingly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Matthews
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.